David Lloyd kindly scanned all this for me, and added these comments:
The pencil edits you see were done in preparation for the reprinting of this piece in a later newsletter. I put little contrast on these scans to make them as legible as I could for you. Replies from the writers were merely pasted down extracts from letters written with varying conditions of ribbons, and then photocopied. Pre-computer days. And also good exciting days, when there was much enthusiasm around about what could happen and should happen in the business.
One thing to mention - the SSI's accurate name was the Society of Strip Illustration. The founders of the society in '77 figured using 'illustration' in that way embraced all the creative tasks involved in the medium and those who performed them. It was a really important part of the scene in those days, and I was extremely proud to have been active in it.










May 8 2007, 20:56:35 UTC 5 years ago
May 8 2007, 21:17:14 UTC 5 years ago
May 9 2007, 13:27:44 UTC 5 years ago
Anonymous
April 30 2008, 18:52:12 UTC 4 years ago
What story is he talking about?
I notice that Moore refers to a story, alternately "Southern Comfort" or "Southern Change", as having been published in the most recent Summer Special.However, I've never seen this story listed anywhere. I can't find a reference to it on the 2000 AD website, and, according to that site, the only "Summer Special" was in 1977.
Anybody have any idea what he's talking about?
Anonymous
April 30 2008, 19:32:39 UTC 4 years ago
I found the story now
OK, the story he is talking about is:"Southern Comfort", 2000 A.D. Sci-Fi Special 1981, credited to "R.E. Wright" as writer, and "W. Howarth" as artist.
Now I have a new question for you. If Moore took the "R.E. Wright" credit because he was unhappy with the art (or editing, possibly), does that mean that this story is also Alan Moore:
"Easy Kill", prog 205 (Mar. 1981). Story by "R.E. Wright," art by Gary Leach.
May 3 2008, 18:23:39 UTC 4 years ago
Re: I found the story now
There was thread about this on the Alan Moore Yahoo! Group, here. My reply then, as now, is this:There are three possible explanations that spring to mind: Firstly, the
piece is misattributed, and it was actually Pat Mills rather than AM
who said this. Or the story was pulled by the editorial team and
rewriten by Mills under the pseudonym RE Wright (rewrite, see?).
Alternatively, RE Wright could be a house name that authors got to put
on their stories if they were unhappy with the artwork, in the same way
that film directors use the name Alan Smithee.